"Circassian" narratives in modern politics of memory in Georgia (2011–2021)
https://doi.org/10.31143/2542-212X-2022-2-148-164
EDN: FDGDEW
Abstract
This study analyzes the Circassian dimension in the modern Georgian politics of memory. The author analyzes the main vectors and trajectories of the development of Circassian narratives in the modern memorial canon of Georgia. The novelty of the study lies in the analysis of the practices and strategies used by Georgian intellectuals within the framework of the functioning of Circassian narratives in the modern memorial canon of Georgia as an element of the politics of memory. The article analyzes 1) the role of political elites and the media in the formation of Circassian narratives in the politics of memory, 2) the features of the performative turn in the historical policy of promoting Circassian images, 3) the role of Circassian narratives in the “wars of memory”. This article shows both the merging and conflict potential of the Circassian dimension in Georgian historical politics. The author analyzes the roles of state authorities and the media as the key participants in the policy of memory and formatters of the memorial canon. It is assumed that the Circassian narratives in the modern memorial canon are predominantly symbolic for solving internal political problems, since external factors minimized the real influence of Georgia in the region. The results of the study show that the Circassian narratives in the Georgian politics of memory became an element of the ideological legitimization of the elites and the promotion of the concept of Georgia’s special role in the Caucasus, as well as the formation of alternative versions of memory to the perception of Circassian images in the Russian historical imagination.
About the Author
M. V. Kirchanov
Voronezh State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maksym V. Kirchanov – Doctor of Science (History)
Voronezh
References
1. AYMERMACHER K., BORDYUGOV G. «Svoyo» i «chuzhoye» proshloye ["Own" and "foreign" past]. In: Natsional'nyye istorii v sovetskom i postsovetskikh gosudarstvakh / red. K. Aymermakher, G. Bordyugov; predisl. F. Bomsdorfa. – M.: Fond Fridrikha Naumanna, AIRO-XX, 2003. – S. 14–17. (In Russ.).
2. BORDYUGOV G., BUKHAREV V. Natsional'naya istoricheskaya mysl' v usloviyakh sovetskogo vremeni [National historical thought in the Soviet era]. In: Natsional'nyye istorii v sovetskom i postsovet skikh gosudarstvakh / red. K. Aymermakher, G. Bordyugov; predisl. F. Bomsdorfa. – M.: Fond Fridrikha Naumanna, AIRO-XX, 2003. – S. 21–72. (In Russ.).
3. DOSS F. Kak segodnya pishetsya istoriya: vzglyad s frantsuzskoy storony [How history is written today: a view from the French side]. In: Kak my pishem istoriyu / otv. red. G. Garreta, G. Dyufo, L. Pimenova. – M.: ROSSPEN, 2013. – S. 9–56. (In Russ.).
4. GATAGOVA L. Severnyy Kavkaz: metamorfozy istoricheskogo soznaniya [North Caucasus: metamorphoses of historical consciousness]. In: Natsional'nyye istorii v sovetskom i postsovetskikh gosudarstvakh / red. K. Aymermakher, G. Bordyugov; predisl. F. Bomsdorfa. – M.: Fond Fridrikha Naumanna, AIRO-XX, 2003. – S. 255–272. (In Russ.).
5. KIRCHANOV M. The Caucasian and the Russian in contemporary Georgian nationalism. In: Central Asia and the Caucasus. – 2013. – Vol. 14. – No 4. – P. 101–109. (In Russ.).
6. KIRCHANOV M.V. "Politika proshlogo" v sovremennoy Gruzii, ili kak SMI i publichnyye politiki formiruyut kollektivnyye predstavleniya o proshlom ["Politics of the past" in modern Georgia, or how the media and public politicians form collective ideas about the past]. In: Dialog so vremenem. – 2016. – № 56. – S. 374–395. (In Russ.).
7. KIRCHANOV M.V. "Tskhinval'skiy region" i "Avtonomnaya Respublika Abkhaziya" kak "mesta pamyati" i izobretennyye traditsii v sovremennom gruzinskom politicheskom voobrazhenii (2018-2019) ["Tskhinvali region" and "Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia" as "places of memory" and invented traditions in the modern Georgian political imagination (2018-2019)]. In: Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya. – 2020. – T. 4. – № 3. – S. 327–333. (In Russ.).
8. KIRCHANOV M.V. Dikhotomiya "Yevropa – Rossiya" kak izobretennaya traditsiya sovremennogo gruzinskogo natsionalizma [Dichotomy "Europe - Russia" as an invented tradition of modern Georgian nationalism]. In: Mezhdunarodnaya analitika. – 2021. – T. 12. – № 1. – S. 35–54. (In Russ.).
9. KIRCHANOV M.V. Istoricheskaya politika v natsional'nykh respublikakh Kavkaza: kommemorativnyye praktiki kak izobretennyye traditsii [Historical Politics in the National Republics of the Caucasus: Commemorative Practices as Invented Traditions]. In: Elektronnyi zhurnal "Kavkazologiya". – 2020. – № 1. – S. 219–236. – DOI 10.31143/2542-212X-2020-1-219-236 (In Russ.).
10. KOLOSOVSKAYA T.A., TKACHENKO D.S. Imperskaya politika pamyati na kavkaze: mekhanizmy konstruirovaniya massovogo istoricheskogo soznaniya (XIX – nachalo XX vekov) [Imperial Politics of Memory in the Caucasus: Mechanisms for the Construction of Mass Historical Consciousness (XIX - early XX centuries)]. In: Novyi istoricheskiy vestnik. – 2020. – № 2 (64). – S. 131–154. (In Russ.).
11. KOPOSOV N. Istoricheskiye ponyatiya v mire bez budushchego [Historical concepts in a world without a future]. In: Kak my pishem istoriyu / otv. red. G. Garreta, G. Dyufo, L. Pimenova. – M.: ROSSPEN, 2013. – S. 57–93. (In Russ.).
12. KRŬSTEV D. Kanon i/ili agon. Literaturnoistoricheskite (re)konstruktsii [Canon and / or agon. Literary-historical (re) constructions]. In: Kultura i kritika. T. 3. Krayat na modernostta? / sŭst. A. Vacheva, G. Chobanov. – Varna: LiterNet, 2003. – S. 416 – 449. (in Bulgarian).
13. LEONT'YEVA O.B. "Memorial'nyi povorot" v sovremennoy rossiyskoy istoricheskoy nauke ["Memorial turn" in modern Russian historical science]. In: Dialog so vremenem. – 2015. – № 50. – S. 59–96. (In Russ.).
14. MARKAVA A. Histaryčnaja sviadomasć jak pradmiet samareflieksii ŭ češskaj histaryjahrafii [Historical consciousness as a subject of self-reflection in Czech historiography]. In: Bielaruski Histaryčny Ahliad. – 2012. – T. 19. – Sš. 1–2. – S. 179–212. (in Belarusian).
15. MARKEDONOV S.M. Prazdniki i pamyatnyye daty postsovetskogo Zakavkaz'ya: istoriya i politika [Holidays and memorable dates of the post-Soviet Transcaucasia: history and politics]. In: Neprikosnovennyy zapas. Debaty o politike i kul'ture. – 2015. – № 3. – S. 273–285. (In Russ.).
16. MILLER A.I. Rossiya: Vlast' i istoriya [Russia: Power and history]. In: Pro et Contra. – 2009. – № 3–4. – S. 6–23. (In Russ.).
17. NECHAYEV D.N., LEONOVA O.V. Memorial'naya kul'tura i politicheskaya mifologiya: politika pamyati v sfere gosudarstvennogo upravleniya Rossii i gosudarstv postsovetskogo prostranstva [Memorial Culture and Political Mythology: The Politics of Memory in the Sphere of Public Administration in Russia and the States of the Post-Soviet Space]. In: Vestnik Povolzhskogo instituta upravleniya. – 2021. – T. 21. – № 1. – S. 12–21. (In Russ.).
18. SAHANOVIČ H. Bielaruskaja histaryjahrafija ŭ acenkach jaje historykaŭ [Belarusian historiography in the estimations of its historians]. In: Bielaruski Histaryčny Ahliad. – 2010. – T. 17. – Sš. 1–2. – S. 225 – 229. (in Belarusian).
19. SAHANOVIČ H. Biezuladdzie i praŭladnasć bielaruskich historykaŭ [Anarchy and the rule of Belarusian historians]. In: Bielaruski Histaryčny Ahliad. – 2013. – T. 20. – Sš. 1–2. – S. 173–188. (in Belarusian).
20. SAHANOVIČ H. Palityčny mif u histaryčnaj pamiaci i historyjapisanni [Political myth in historical memory and historiography]. In: Bielaruski Histaryčny Ahliad. – 2012. – T. 19. – Sš. 1–2. – S. 213–238. (in Belarusian).
21. SAHANOVIČ H. Tanenbierh / Hrunvaĺd / Dubroŭna 1410: simvalizacyja bitvy ŭ Bielarusi [Tannenberg / Grunwald / Dubrowna 1410: symbolization of the battle in Belarus]. In: Bielaruski Histaryčny Ahliad. – 2010. – T. 17. – Sš. 1–2. – S. 89–116. (in Belarusian).
22. SEMENENKO I.S. Politika pamyati v Yevrope i yevropeyskaya politika pamyati: narrativy i oriyentiry [The Politics of Memory in Europe and the Politics of Memory in Europe: Narratives and Landmarks]. In: Dnevnik Altayskoy shkoly politicheskikh issledovaniy. – 2020. – № 36. – S. 23–31. (In Russ.).
23. SHAPINSKAYA E.N. Obrazy proshlogo v (post)sovremennykh reprezentatsiyakh [Images of the past in (post)modern representations]. In: Kul'tura i iskusstvo. – 2019. – № 9. – S. 70–82. (In Russ.).
24. SHNIREL'MAN V.A. Voyny pamyati: mify, identichnost' i politika v Zakavkaz'ye [Memory Wars: Myths, Identity and Politics in Transcaucasia]. – Moscow: Akademkniga, 2003. – 591 s.
Review
For citations:
Kirchanov M.V. "Circassian" narratives in modern politics of memory in Georgia (2011–2021). Kavkazologiya. 2022;(2):148-164. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31143/2542-212X-2022-2-148-164. EDN: FDGDEW
Views:
13
Email this article 