Preview

Kavkazologiya

Advanced search

The former convergence of two autobiographical works by one writer: «The view from the white mountain» and «Whose stirrup we held» by A.P. Keshokov

https://doi.org/10.31143/2542-212X-2022-2-199-213

EDN: FTVOAN

Abstract

The article compares two autobiographical works by A.P. Keshokov — the story «The View from the White Mountain» and the story «Whose stirrup we held». This work tracks the specific manifestations of the writers various hypostases, the peculiarities of the relationship between the author of the depicting and the author of the depicted, the scale of the image of his own image, the "location" that he assigns to his own image in the space and time of the work, emotional contrasts, determining the value vector of the development of events. It is noteworthy that the writer's return to a fragment of his biography once told reveals very significant semantic discrepancies between the two works. The writer could not help but realize that these discrepancies would not escape the attention of his readers. And in these moments, the axiological aspect of the named story and the very fact of returning to the previously illuminated is clarified. The convergence of two autobiographical works by the same writer reveals differences not only in the depiction's completeness of events and persons, but also very noticeable changes in the value attitude towards them. relationship between the author of the depicting and the author of the depicted, the scale of the image of his own image, the "location" that he assigns to his own image in the space and time of the work, emotional contrasts that determine the value vector of the development of events. It is noteworthy that the writer's return to a fragment of his biography once told reveals very significant semantic discrepancies between the two works. The writer could not help but realize that these discrepancies would not escape the attention of his reader. And in these moments, the axiological aspect of the named story and the very fact of returning to the previously illuminated is clarified. The convergence of two autobiographical works by the same writer reveals differences not only in the completeness of the depiction of events and persons, but also very noticeable changes in the value attitude towards them.

About the Author

I. A. Kazharova
The Institute for the Humanities Research – Affiliated Kabardian-Balkarian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Inna A. Kazharova – candidate of science (Philology)

Nalchik



References

1. BAKHTIN M.M. Sobranie sochinenii v 7 t. T. 1. Filosofskaya estetika 1920-kh godov [Collected works: In 7 vols. Vol. 1. Philosophical aesthetics of the 1920s]. Moscow: Russkie slovari; Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2003. – 721 p. (In Russ.).

2. KESHOKOV A.P. Sobranie sochinenii v 6 t. T. 1. Stikhotvoreniya i poemy [Collected works: In 6 vols. Vol. 1. Poems and poems]. – Nalchik: El'brus, 2004. – 512 p. (In Russ.).

3. KESHOKOV A.P. Sobranie sochinenii v 6 t. T. 5. Korni: Roman; Novelly [Collected works: In 6 vols. Vol. 5. Novel; Short stories]. – Nalchik: El'brus, 2006. – 552 p. (In Russ.).

4. KESHOKOV A.P. Sobranie sochinenii v 6 t. T. 6. Rasskaz; Povesti; P'esy [Collected works: In 6 vols.Vol. 6. Short stories; Novellas; Plays]. – Nalchik: El'brus, 2007. – 544 p. (In Russ.).

5. LEZHEN F.V. V zashchitu avtobiografii [In defense of autobiography]. IN: Inostrannaya literatura. – 2000 – № 4. – P. 108-121. (In Russ.).

6. Literaturnaya entsiklopediya terminov i ponyatii [Literary Encyclopedia of terms and concepts] / Edited by A.N. Nikolyukin. – Moscow: NPK «Intelvak», 2001. – 1600 p. (In Russ.).

7. MINNULLIN O.R. Vvedenie v tsennostno-ontologicheskii podkhod k literature: struktura problemnogo polya [Introduction to the value-ontological approach to literature: the structure of the problem field]. IN: Novyi filologicheskii vestnik. – 2022. – № 1 (60). – P. 18-29. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.54770/20729316-2022-1-18

8. Poetika: slovar' aktual'nykh terminov i ponyatii [Poetics: dictionary of current terms and concepts]. – Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Kulaginoi; Intrada, 2008. – 358 p. (In Russ.).

9. SUKHIKH I.N. Struktura i smysl: Teoriya literatury dlya vsekh [Structure and Meaning: A Theory of Literature for Everyone]. – St. Petersburg: Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus, 2016. – 544 p. (In Russ.).

10. TSZYAO VAN. Avtobiografiya kak literaturnoe zhanrovoe obrazovanie: priroda, raznovidnosti i sovremennye modifikatsii [Autobiography as a Literary Genre education: nature, varieties and modern modifications]. IN: Uchenye zapiski Petrozavodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2019. – № 3 (180). – P. 49-53. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15393/uchz.art.2019.308


Review

For citations:


Kazharova I.A. The former convergence of two autobiographical works by one writer: «The view from the white mountain» and «Whose stirrup we held» by A.P. Keshokov. Kavkazologiya. 2022;(2):199-213. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31143/2542-212X-2022-2-199-213. EDN: FTVOAN

Views: 10


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-212X (Online)