Preview

Kavkazologiya

Advanced search

SYNERGETICS AS A MODE OF REPRESENTING THE DYNAMICS OF ETHNO-REGIONAL HISTORICAL SYSTEMS

https://doi.org/10.31143/2542-212X-2020-3-12-47

EDN: VQWRLN

Abstract

Synergetics is a special interdisciplinary field of science, which generalizes the description and interpretation of dynamic processes in complex open systems far from equilibrium. The subject of this article does not refer to synergetics as such or to “authentic synergetics”, which is inseparable from the mathematical language of expression, but to the field of historical knowledge. It attempts to apply a synergetic approach to the knowledge already accumulated within the framework of historical science in order to obtain results that are important for general interpretations of the history of the peoples of the North Caucasus. Any attempt to interpret historical phenomena and processes in terms of “system bifurcation”, “self-organization”, “nonlinearity”, etc. should be preceded by the definition of the object under study as a system and the definition of its specificity as a special type of system. From this point of view, the Adyghe ethno-social area and Kabardino-Balkaria, as objects of historical knowledge can be represented as certain varieties of small historical systems, namely, ethno-regional historical systems. This concept implies a long existence in time and the reproduction of a culturally specific space-time historical integrity. On their historical trajectory, one can clearly distinguish periods of a stationary (stable) state and “gaps” between them i.e. transitional periods of intense socio-political and cultural shifts. This allows it to be represented in terms of synergetics. Reconstruction of the mechanisms and forms of self-organization of an ethnic society at crisis, unstable phases of the historical trajectory allows us to re-imagine the ratio of internal and external, socio-economic and socio-cultural factors of its historical evolution. There are sufficient grounds to believe that the coherence (uniformity and consistency) of social behavior in critical situations was set by a common horizon of ethnic culture, that the need to adapt to a dynamic external environment determined the points of attraction (attractors) around which new, “most probable” configuration of social structures were formed, that the main mechanism of adaptation was cultural interaction and, accordingly, the main function of emerging dissipative (developed, more complex) structures was to increase the degree of communicativeness of culture, i.e. the formation of channels and agents of cultural interaction, the development of the ability to perceive and transfer experience, to enrich and universalize their own cultural meanings.

About the Author

A. Kh. BOROV
FSBSE «Federal Scientific Center ‘Kabardin-Balkar Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences’»
Russian Federation


References

1. AFANAS'EV Yu.N. Fenomen sovetskoi istoriografii [Phenomenon of soviet historiography]. IN: Otechestvennaya istoriya. – 1996. – No. 5. – P. 144-168. (In Russian)

2. BARG M.A. Epokhi i idei: Stanovlenie istorizma [Epochs and ideas: The forming of historicism]. – M.: Mysl', 1987. – 354 p. (In Russian)

3. BORODKIN L.I. Modelirovanie istoricheskikh protsessov: ot rekonstruktsii real'nosti k analizu al'ternativ [Modeling of historical processes: from the reconstruction of reality to the analysis of alternatives]. – SPb.: Aleteiya, 2016. – 303 p. (In Russian)

4. CHERNAVSKII D. S. Sinergetika i informatsiya (dinamicheskaya teoriya informatsii) [Synergetics and Information (dynamic theory of information)]. – M.: Editorial URSS, 2004. – 288 p. (In Russian)

5. FEDOTOVA V.G. Metodologiya istorii segodnya [Methodology of history today]. IN: Novaya i noveishaya istoriya. – 1996. – No. 6. – P. 61-75. (In Russian)

6. GADDIS J.L. The Landscape of History. How Historians Map the Past. – New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. – 192 p. (In English)

7. GIDDENS A. Devyat' tezisov o budushchem sotsiologii [Nine theses on the future of sociology]. IN: THESIS. Teoriya i istoriya ekonomicheskikh i sotsial'nykh institutov i sistem. – 1993. – Vol. 1. – Iss. 1. – P. 57-82. (In Russian)

8. GOMAYUNOV S.A. Ot istorii sinergetiki k sinergetike istorii [From the history of synergetics to the synergetics of history]. IN: Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. – 1994. – No. 2. – P. 99-106. (In Russian)

9. GUBIN V.B. Psevdosinergetika – noveishaya lzhenauka [Pseudo-synergetics – newest pseudo-science]. IN: V zashchitu nauki / otv. red. E.P. Kruglyakov [In defense of science / E.P. Kruglyakov ed.]. – M.: Nauka, 2006. – P. 110-119. (In Russian)

10. HAKEN H. Informatsiya i samoorganizatsiya. Makroskopicheskii podkhod k slozhnym sistemam [Information and Self-Organization. A Macroscopic Approach to Complex Systems]. – M.: Mir, 1991. – 240 p. (In Russian)

11. HAKEN H. Tainy prirody. Sinergetika: uchenie o vzaimodeistvii [Secrets of Nature. Synergetics: Science of Interaction]. – M.; Izhevsk: Institut komp'yuternykh issledovanii, 2003. – 320 p. (In Russian)

12. IONIN L.G. Sotsiologiya kul'tury [Sociology of culture]. – M.: Logos, 1996. – 280 p. (In Russian)

13. IONOV I.N. Na puti k teorii tsivilizatsii (poznavatel'nye predposylki i trudnosti istoricheskogo sinteza) [Towards a theory of civilization (cognitive prerequisites and difficulties of historical synthesis)]. IN: Tsivilizatsii. Vyp. 3 [Civilizations. 3d issue]. – M.: Nauka, 1995. – P. 15-37. (In Russian)

14. IONOV I.N. Teoriya tsivilizatsii: etapy stanovleniya i razvitiya [Theory of civilization: stages of forming and development]. IN: Novaya i noveishaya istoriya. – 1994. – No. 4-5. – P. 33-50. (In Russian)

15. Istoricheskii ocherk [Outline of history]. IN: Adygskaya (cherkesskaya) entsiklopediya [Adyghe (Circassian) encyclopedia]. – M.: Fond im. B.Kh. Akbasheva, 2006. – P. 55-312. (In Russian)

16. KAPITSA S.P., KURDYUMOV S.P., MALINETSKII G.G. Sinergetika i prognozy budushchego [Synergetics and future forecasts]. – M.: Nauka, 1997. – 285 p. (In Russian)

17. KARA-MURZA A.A., PANARIN A.S., PANTIN I.K. Dukhovno-ideologicheskaya situatsiya v sovremennoi Rossii: perspektivy razvitiya [Spiritual and ideological situation in modern Russia: development prospects]. IN: Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. – 1995. – No. 4. – P. 6-17. (In Russian)

18. KAZHAROV V.Kh. Traditsionnye obshchestvennye instituty kabardintsev i ikh krizis v kontse XVIII – pervoi polovine XIX v. [Traditional social institutions of Kabardians and their crisis in the late 18th – first half of the 19th century] – Nal'chik: Izdatel'skii tsentr «El'-Fa», 1994. – 438 p. (In Russian)

19. KHVOSTOVA K.V. Sposoby funktsionirovaniya Vizantiiskoi tsivilizatsii vo vremeni [The ways of functioning of the Byzantine civilization in time]. IN: Tsivilizatsii. Vyp. 3 [Civilizations. 3d issue]. – M.: Nauka, 1995. – P. 189-198. (In Russian)

20. KNYAZEVA E.N. Sinergetika [Synergetics]. IN: Entsiklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki [Encyclopedia of epistemology and philosophy of science]. – M.: «Kanon+» ROII «Reabilitatsiya», 2009. – P. 861-862. (In Russian)

21. KOZLOVA N.N., SMIRNOVA N.M. Krizis klassicheskikh metodologii i sovremennaya poznavatel'naya situatsiya [The crisis of classical methodologies and the modern cognitive situation]. IN: Sotsis. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. – 1995. – No.11. – P. 12-22. (In Russian)

22. Kruglyi stol «Sinergetika: perspektivy, problemy, trudnosti» [Round table “Synergetics: prospects, problems, difficulties”]. IN: Voprosy filosofii. – 2006. – No. 9. – P. 3-33. (In Russian)

23. LASZLO E. Rozhdenie slova – nauki – epokhi [The birth of the word – scence – era]. IN: Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. – 1993. – No. 2. – P. 25-30. (In Russian)

24. MOGIL'NITSKII B.G. Mezhdu ob"ektivizmom i relyativizmom: Diskussii v sovremennoi amerikanskoi istoriografii [Between objectivism and relativism: discussions in modern American historiography]. IN: Novaya i noveishaya istoriya. – 1993. – No. 5. – P. 3-17. (In Russian)

25. PRIGOGINE I. Filosofiya nestabil'nosti [Philosophy of instability]. IN: Voprosy filosofii. – 1991. – No. 6. – P. 46-57. (In Russian)

26. PRIGOGINE I. Ot sushchestvuyushchego k voznikayushchemu. Vremya i slozhnost' v fizicheskikh naukakh [From Being to Becoming: time and complexity in the physical sciences]. – M.: Nauka, 1985. – 328 p. (In Russian)

27. PRIGOGINE I., STENGERS I. Poryadok iz khaosa: Novyi dialog cheloveka s prirodoi [Order out of Chaos. Man's new dialogue with nature]. – M.: Progress, 1986. – 432 p. (In Russian)

28. SAPRONOV M.V. Kontseptsii samoorganizatsii v obshchestvoznanii: moda ili neobkhodimost'? (Razmyshleniya o budushchem istoricheskoi nauki) [Self-organization concepts in social science: fashion or necessity? (Reflections on the future of historical science)]. IN: Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. – 2001. – No. 1. – P. 148-161. (In Russian)

29. SAVEL'EVA I.M., POLETAEV A.V. Istoriya i vremya. V poiskakh utrachennogo [History and time. In search of the lost]. – M.: Yazyki russkoi kul'tury, 1997. – 800 p. (In Russian)

30. SEMENOV Yu.I. Materialisticheskoe ponimanie istorii: nedavnee proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee [Materialistic understanding of history: its recent past, present, future]. IN: Novaya i noveishaya istoriya. – 1996. – No. 3. – P. 80-84. (In Russian)

31. SEMENOV Yu.I. Vsemirnaya istoriya kak edinyi protsess razvitiya chelovechestva vo vremeni i prostranstve [World history as a single process of human development in time and space]. IN: Filosofiya i obshchestvo. – 1997. – No. 1. – P. 156-217. (In Russian)

32. SHEVLOKOV V.A. Novye gorizonty sinergeticheskikh issledovanii: sotsiosinergetika [New horizons of studies in synergetics: socio-synergetics]. IN: Mir etnosa (aspekty i metody issledovaniya) [The world of ethnos (aspects and methods of study)]. – Nal'chik: B.i., 1999. – P. 6-29. (In Russian)

33. SMITH S. Postmodernizm i sotsial'naya istoriya na Zapade: problemy i perspektivy [Postmodernism and Social History in the West: Issues and Prospects]. IN: Voprosy istorii. – 1997. – No. 8. – P. 154-161. (In Russian)

34. SMOLENSKII N.I. Problemy teoreticheskogo plyuralizma [Problems of theoretical pluralism]. IN: Novaya i noveishaya istoriya. – 1998. – No. 1. – P. 6-18. (In Russian)

35. SMOLENSKII N.I. Vozmozhna li obshcheistoricheskaya teoriya? [Is a general historical theory possible?]. IN: Novaya i noveishaya istoriya. – 1996. – No.1. – P. 5-11. (In Russian)

36. STEPIN V.S. Nauka [Science]. IN: Entsiklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki [Encyclopedia of epistemology and philosophy of science]. – M.: «Kanon+» ROII «Reabilitatsiya», 2009. – P. 560-566. (In Russian)

37. STEPIN V.S. O filosofskikh osnovaniyakh sinergetiki [On philosophic foundations of synergetics]. IN: Sinergeticheskaya paradigma. Sinergetika obrazovaniya [Synergetic paradigm. Synergetics of education]. – M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2007. – P. 97-102. (In Russian)

38. STONE L. History and the Social Sciences in the Twentieth Century. IN: STONE L. The Past and the Present Revisited. – London and New York: Routledge, 1987. – P. 3-44. (In English)

39. WALLERSTAIN I. Sotsial'noe izmenenie vechno? Nichto nikogda ne menyaetsya? [Is social change perpetual? Nothing ever changes?]. IN: Sotsis. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. – 1997. – No. 1. – P. 8-21. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


BOROV A.Kh. SYNERGETICS AS A MODE OF REPRESENTING THE DYNAMICS OF ETHNO-REGIONAL HISTORICAL SYSTEMS. Kavkazologiya. 2020;(3):12-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31143/2542-212X-2020-3-12-47. EDN: VQWRLN

Views: 4


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-212X (Online)