THE SEARCH AFTER HISTORICAL SYNTHESIS
https://doi.org/10.31143/2542-212X-2019-2-206-216
EDN: LCICPY
Abstract
The basic intention of the authors of the reviewed publication was to get nearer to historical synthesis in understanding the complex interplay of geopolitical, socio-political and socio-cultural factors conditioning the content and the forms of political rapprochement and consequent incorporation of the region into Russian empire during the 16th – 19th centuries. In the work’s two parts this process is examined in accordance with the periodization suggested by the authors: 16th – 18th centuries – the stage of transition from asymmetric partnership to Russian domination in the macro-region; 1801-1864 – the stage of direct incorporation of the macro-region into the empires state frame. Caucasian war is interpreted as military-political dimension of the process of incorporation. Temporal and political boundaries of the war are limited by the initial and final pints of the process of irreversible changes in political and administrative status of territories, societies and peoples of the region resulting from armed struggle between Russian empire and local ethno-political formations. Military envelope of the process was to a large extent caused by civilizational distance between the sides of the conflict. Simultaneously it entailed deep restructuring of ethno-demographic and ethno-social composition, administrative and judicial system, cultural and ideological spheres of region’s life thus bringing closer imperial state and North Caucasus peoples to better mutual understanding. There are some propositions in the work, which aren’t fully consistent with the historical realities of the epoch: on the system of “vertical” hierarchy of societies in the region where the “lowers” always dominate the “uppers”; on early rooting of Islam in Daghestan; on 16th century Tarki Shamhaldom while at that time it was really Gazi-Kumukh Shamhaldom: on the absence of state institutions in native ethno-social formations. Some elements of the proposed in the work periodization give rise to objections as well. But in general, suggested in the book conceptual chain – “accession-incorporation -legitimation-integration-synthesis” seems to be interesting. It reflects not as much stages as aspects, various “phase states” of Russia-North Caucasus relations, which are present in various degrees at the every stage of their development.
References
1. Akty, sobrannye Kavkazskoi arkheograficheskoi komissiei (AKAK) [Documents compiled by Caucasian archeographical commission]: in 12 vols. – Tiflis: Tipografiya Glavnogo Upravleniya Namestnika Kavkazskogo, 1904. – Vol. XII. – 1558 p. (In Russian)
2. CHIRG A.Yu. Razvitie obshchestvenno-politicheskogo stroya adygov Severo-Zapadnogo Kavkaza (konets XVIII – 60-e gg. XIX v.) [The development of the social and political system of the Circassians of the North-Western Caucasus (end of the 18th – 60s of the 19th century)]. – Maikop: OOO «Kachestvo», 2002. – 204 p. (In Russian)
3. DEGOEV V.V. Kavkaz i velikie derzhavy 1829-1864 gg. Politika, voina, diplomatiya [Caucasus and the Great Powers of 1829-1864. Politics, war, diplomacy]. – Moscow: Izdatel'skii dom «Rubezhi XXI», 2009. – 551 p. (In Russian)
4. DEGOEV V.V. Kavkazskaya voina: predotvratimaya neizbezhnost' ili neumolimost' istorii? [Caucasian War: preventable inevitability or inexorability of history?] 05.10.2014 [Electronic resource]. IN: Information agency REX: website. URL: http://www.iarex.ru/articles/51065.html (date of access: 04.05.2019). (In Russian)
5. DRUZHININA E.I. Kyuchuk-Kainardzhiiskii mir 1774 goda. (Ego podgotovka i zaklyuchenie) [Kyuchuk-Kaynardzhy peace treaty of 1774. (preparation and making of Peace)]. – M.: Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk USSR, 1955. – 368 p. (In Russian)
6. DZHIMOV B.M. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe i politicheskoe polozhenie adygov v XIX veke [Socio-economic and political condition of Adygs in the XIX century]. – Maikop: Krasnodarskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo: Adygeiskoe otdelenie, 1986. – 192 p. (In Russian)
7. GIL'DENSHTEDT I.A. Puteshestvie po Kavkazu v 1770-1773 gg. [Journey through the Caucasus in 1770-1773]. – SPb.: Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie, 2002. – 512 p. (In Russian)
8. KANDOR R.S. Transformatsiya traditsionnoi sistemy upravleniya zapadnykh adygov (cherkesov) (konets XVIII v. – 60-e gg. XIX v.) [Transformation of the traditional System of Administration among western Adygs (Circassians) (the end of the 18th – 60-ies of the 19th century)]. – Maikop: Izd-vo: Pashtov Z.V., 2009. – 216 p. (In Russian)
9. KASUMOV R.M. Konstantinopol'skii russko-turetskii dogovor 1724 goda [Constantinople Russian-Turkish Treaty of 1724]. IN: Izvestiya Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Obshchestvennye i gumanitarnye nauki. – 2010. – No. 2. – P. 24-29. (In Russian)
10. KHOTKO S.Kh. Otkrytie Cherkesii. Kartograficheskie istochniki XIV-XIX vv. [Opening Circassia. Cartographic sources of 14th –19th centuries]. – Maikop: OAO «Poligraf-YuG», 2015. – 292 p. (In Russian)
11. KIRZIOĞLU M.F. Osmanlılar’ın Kafkas-Elleri’ni Fethi (1451-1590) [The Ottoman conquest of the Caucasus (1451-1590)]. – Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, 1998. – 552 p. (In Turkish)
12. KOROLENKO P.P. Pereselenie kazakov za Kuban' v 1861 g. Russkaya kolonizatsiya na Zapadnom Kavkaze (s prilozheniem dokumentov i zapiski polkovnika Sharapa) [Settlement of the Cossacks over the Kuban in 1861. Russian colonization in the Western Caucasus (with the supplement of documents and Colonel Sharap’s memo)]. IN: Kubanskii sbornik. – Ekaterinodar. – 1911. – Vol. XVI. – P. 266-575. (In Russian)
13. KUDAEVA S.G. Adygi cherkesy Severo-Zapadnogo Kavkaza v XIX veke: protsessy transformatsii i differentsiatsii adygskogo obshchestva [Adygs (Circassians) of the North-West Caucasus in the 19th Century: the processes of transformation and differentiation of the Adyg society]. Ed. by E.A. Sheudzhen. – Maikop: Magarin O.G., 2014. – 388 p. (In Russian)
14. NOL'DE B.E. Istoriya formirovaniya Rossiiskoi imperii [The history of the formation of the Russian Empire]. Transl. from Fran. By L.F. Sakhibgareevoi. Ed. by V.A. Tishkov. – SPb.: Izdatel'svo Olega Abyshko, 2019. – 768 p. (In Russian)
15. Otnoshenie grafa Nessel'rode k grafu Paskevichu, ot 8 aprelya 1830 g. [The memo of Count Nesselrode to Count Paskevich, April 8, 1830]. IN: AKAK: in 12 vols. – Tiflis: Tipografiya Glavnogo Upravleniya Namestnika Kavkazskogo, 1878. – Vol. VII. – P. 887-891. (In Russian)
16. Pis'mo knyazya Baryatinskogo k voennomu ministru N.O. Sukhozanetu. 8 noyabrya 1857 g. Tiflis [Letter by Prince Baryatinsky to the Minister of War N.O. Suhozanet. November 8, 1857 Tiflis] IN: Russkii arkhiv. – 1889. – Iss. 2. – P. 339-351. (In Russian)
17. Predpisanie grafa Chernysheva general-leitenantu Vel'yaminovu, ot 14 noyabrya 1836 g. [The instruction of Count Chernyshev to lieutenant-general Velyaminov, dated November 14, 1836]. IN: AKAK: in 12 vols. – Tiflis: Tipografiya Glavnogo Upravleniya Namestnika Kavkazskogo, 1881. – Vol. VIII. – P. 647-648. (In Russian)
18. Raport shtabs-kapitana Novitskogo grafu Paskevichu, ot 16 yanvarya 1831 g. [Report of the staff captain Novitsky to Count Paskevich, dated January 16, 1831]. IN: AKAK: in 12 vols. – Tiflis: Tipografiya Glavnogo Upravleniya Namestnika Kavkazskogo, 1878. – Vol. VII. – P. 900-901. (In Russian)
19. RGVIA – Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi voenno-istoricheskii arkhiv [Russian State Military Historical Archives].
20. Rossiya i narody Severnogo Kavkaza v XVI – seredine XIX veka: sotsiokul'turnaya distantsiya i dvizhenie k gosudarstvenno-politicheskomu edinstvu [Russia and the peoples of the North Caucasus in the sixteenth – mid nineteenth centuries: sociocultural distance and movement towards state and political unity]. – Nalchik: Redaktsionno-izdatel'skii otdel IGI KBNTs RAN, 2018. – 268 p. (In Russian)
21. SHEUDZHEN E.A. Adygi (cherkesy) v prostranstve istoricheskoi pamyati [Adygs (Circassians) in the space of historical memory]. – Maikop: Izd-vo AGU, 2010. – 280 p. (In Russian)
22. SHEUDZHEN E.A. Kavkazskaya voina v prostranstve istoricheskoi pamyati [Caucasian war in the space of historical memory]. – Maikop: Istoricheskii fakul'tet AGU, 2009. – 42 p. (In Russian)
23. SHEUDZHEN E.A. O «natsional'noi istoriografii», «natsional'nykh istorikakh», «svoei» istorii i «istoriopisaniyakh» [On the "national historiography", "national historians", "one’s own" history and "historiography"]. IN: Nauchnaya mysl' Kavkaza. – 2012. – No. 2. – P. 90-98. (In Russian)
24. SHEUDZHEN E.A. Unichizhitel'naya terminologiya kak marker konfliktnosti (o «khishchnikakh» i «khishchnichestve») [Derogatory terminology as a marker of conflict (on «predators» and «predation»)]. IN: Nauchnoe obespechenie regional'nogo razvitiya. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii. 23-24 aprelya 2015 g. [Scientific sustenance of regional development. Proceedings of the international scientific conference. April 23-24, 2015]. – Rostov on/D.: Fond nauki i obrazovaniya, 2015. – P. 385-392. (In Russian)
25. Tragicheskie posledstviya Kavkazskoi voiny dlya adygov. Vtoraya polovina XIX – nachalo XX veka. Sbornik dokumentov i materialov [The tragic consequences of the Caucasian war for the Circassians. The second half of 19th – early 20th century. Collection of documents and materials]. – Nalchik: «El'-Fa», 2000. – 458 p. (In Russian)
26. ZHENETL' A.T. Vooruzhenie i metody vedeniya Kavkazskoi voiny [Weapons and methods of warfare in the Caucasian War] IN: Natsional'no-osvoboditel'naya bor'ba narodov Severnogo Kavkaza i problemy mukhadzhirstva. Materialy Vsesoyuznoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. 24-26 oktyabrya 1990 g. [The national liberation struggle of the peoples of the North Caucasus and the problems of Muhajirism. Materials of the All-Union scientific-practical conference. October 24-26, 1990]. – Nalchik: «El'brus», 1994. – P. 244-248. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
KURBANOV A.D. THE SEARCH AFTER HISTORICAL SYNTHESIS. E-Journal “Kavkazologiya”. 2019;(2):206-216. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31143/2542-212X-2019-2-206-216. EDN: LCICPY